Tutoring is working when comparable evidence shows movement towards the agreed goal and the learner can increasingly explain, attempt, use feedback or correct work with less support. Attendance, a friendly relationship or a single later grade is not enough by itself.
Return to the agreement
You need:
- baseline task and help used;
- observable capability;
- tutor/learner actions;
- comparable evidence;
- review date;
- limits and referral triggers.
If these were never agreed, pause and use the tutoring-goal template. Do not invent a baseline after seeing the outcome.
Look at four layers of evidence
| Layer | Early evidence | Later evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Process | sessions target the goal; work and feedback are recorded | plan adapts to repeated evidence |
| Skill | learner explains a step or completes a bounded task more accurately | skill transfers to varied/class work |
| Independence | fewer or smaller prompts; learner identifies errors/questions | learner selects strategies and checks without tutor presence |
| Outcome | small comparable task improves | school assessment/grade trend where relevant and interpretable |
Confidence and willingness matter, but ask what the learner now attempts or does differently.
Use the review tracker
| Evidence | Baseline | Now | Help used | Interpretation | Next check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Choose fresh but comparable work. A repeated identical question may measure memory of that answer. For essays, compare the same criterion on a different prompt. For maths, vary presentation while keeping the method demand.
Ask the learner
- What are you working on and why?
- What can you now do without the tutor?
- Which prompt helps, and can it be reduced?
- What still feels unclear?
- Can you disagree or say when an explanation does not help?
- Is anything about contact or sessions uncomfortable?
Ask the tutor for evidence, not adjectives
A useful update states:
- task/skill addressed;
- learner evidence and help used;
- one next action and how it will be checked.
“Great session, much more confident” is encouraging but incomplete.
Interpret school grades cautiously
A grade may cover different topics, difficulty and conditions from the baseline. Ask which component changed. Do not credit or blame tuition alone when school teaching, practice, attendance and assessment variation also matter.
The DfE tutoring review studied school programmes and noted that stronger assessment used formative evidence aligned with component knowledge, including decisions about when tuition was no longer needed. This supports the review structure, not a private-tuition result guarantee.
Make one decision
- Continue: baseline, change and next step are clear.
- Adjust: narrow the goal, change task/format/rhythm and set another review.
- Connect: evidence needs school or specialist input.
- Change tutor: plan remains vague, teaching/fit/reliability is weak or dependency grows.
- Stop: goal is met, tuition no longer fits or safety/quality requires it.
Use the change-or-stop rubric. Return to the private tuition roadmap if the original support decision itself needs revisiting.
Use an evidence ladder
| Level | Evidence | Caution |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Process | Sessions happen, materials fit the course, learner participates | Attendance alone is not learning |
| 2. Understanding | Learner can explain the key decision | Explanation may still depend on prompts |
| 3. Fresh performance | Comparable task completed with less help | One immediate success may not last |
| 4. Retention/transfer | Skill appears after a gap or in a mixed context | Conditions should be recorded |
| 5. School outcome | Relevant work/assessment reflects the change | Many factors affect grades and marks |
| 6. Independence | Learner starts, checks and asks without tutor dependence | The goal is not endless tuition |
Look for movement through the ladder over time, not a fixed session count.
Compare baseline and review fairly
Keep task conditions similar:
- same course skill and comparable difficulty;
- notes open or closed;
- amount and type of prompting;
- timing conditions;
- fresh versus repeated item;
- who marked or reviewed the work.
A harder review task may show growth despite a similar raw score. An identical memorised task may overstate it.
Worked review
Goal: plan a GCSE Literature argument before writing.
Baseline: learner lists quotations and needs a full paragraph frame.
After initial teaching: learner can state a line of argument with two specific prompts.
Later fresh task: learner independently chooses an argument and evidence, but paragraphs remain disconnected.
Decision: tutoring is producing meaningful progress in planning and reduced support; the next goal should focus on linking stages, not declaring the whole essay skill complete.
Ask the learner and school evidence
Learner:
- What can you now start without waiting for the tutor?
- Which prompt have you learned to give yourself?
- Where are you still dependent?
- Does the work feel aligned with school?
School evidence, where available and appropriate:
- teacher feedback on the same skill;
- comparable classwork;
- assessment evidence with conditions;
- whether missed prerequisites remain.
Do not pressure a child to perform progress for adults at every session.
Use the review to make a decision
- Continue: clear movement and a still-relevant goal.
- Adjust: teaching, task or evidence is mismatched.
- Connect: school input or another support route is needed.
- Pause: evidence is unclear or capacity is poor.
- Stop: goal met, poor fit, dependency, no meaningful progress after adaptation, cost/priority decision or concern.
Copyable progress review
Original goal/baseline:
Current fresh task:
Support then/currently:
What transferred or was retained:
Learner's view:
School evidence:
What remains:
Decision and reason:
Next review or exit step:
Sources
Frequently asked questions
How quickly should tutoring improve grades?
There is no universal timeline. Grades combine many topics and conditions. Agree a specific skill goal and review comparable work, help used and independence before interpreting later school outcomes.
Is confidence enough to show progress?
Confidence is useful learner feedback, but pair it with observable work: what the learner attempts, explains, corrects and completes with less prompting.
Keep reading
A parent's guide to private tuition in the UK
A seven-stage roadmap for defining a learning need, checking alternatives, choosing tuition safely, setting goals and deciding when to stop.
Read article →
How to set tutoring goals you can review
Create a tutoring agreement with a baseline, observable capability, shared actions, comparable evidence and an explicit review date.
Read article →
How to help with homework without doing it
Support homework setup, task clarification and help-seeking while preserving the learner's own attempt and useful feedback for school.
Read article →