Online and in-person tutoring can both be useful. Choose by the learner's defined goal, access, attention, subject tools, safety setup, continuity and practical friction—not a claim that one format always produces better results.

Use the fit matrix

FactorOnline questionsIn-person questions
AccessDoes it widen relevant tutor choice and remove travel?Is a suitable tutor/location realistically available?
TechnologyAre device, connection, platform and input tools adequate?Are necessary physical/digital resources available at the location?
AttentionCan the learner work on-screen with agreed boundaries?Does physical presence help, or does travel/environment add strain?
Subject/taskCan equations, diagrams, texts or practical materials be shared well?Does the task benefit from physical materials or paper observation?
Safety/privacyAre accounts, recording, parent availability and reporting clear?Are venue, other adults, arrival/departure and communication clear?
ContinuityCan the same suitable tutor attend reliably?Is travel/weather/schedule likely to interrupt?
Learner voiceCan the learner ask, think aloud and show work comfortably?Does the learner feel able to do the same face to face?

Do not use “learning style” as a shortcut. Observe the actual learner and task.

Separate format from teaching quality

In either mode, a tutor should:

  • understand the subject/course job;
  • inspect current thinking rather than only ask for a grade;
  • explain and then remove support;
  • use a fresh independent attempt;
  • record evidence and next steps;
  • maintain appropriate boundaries;
  • be willing to adjust or refer when tuition is not the right support.

EEF's one-to-one tuition evidence mostly comes from education settings and does not establish a universal consumer verdict between online and in-person private tutoring.

Check safety for the chosen setting

Use current official guidance. For England, the DfE parent guide covers tutors and out-of-school settings. Online questions include platform access, recording/data, direct messages and who is present/available. In-person questions include venue, supervision, household/centre arrangements, collection and how concerns are reported.

Disclosure systems and eligibility differ across UK nations. A check is only one part of safer selection.

Run the same bounded trial test

Before either trial, share the goal and baseline work. Afterwards, record:

EvidenceOnline/in-person result
Learner could explain the task and ask questions
Tutor adjusted explanation to the attempt
Learner completed a fresh step with less help
Technical/travel friction was manageable
Boundaries and communication felt clear
Tutor proposed a specific next action and review

Ask the learner privately what helped and whether anything felt uncomfortable.

Decide

  • choose the mode with the strongest overall fit;
  • change setup before changing format if the problem is fixable;
  • compare another tutor if teaching evidence is weak;
  • stop if safety or conduct is concerning;
  • revisit after the first agreed review, not after every minor inconvenience.

Use the online tutor scorecard and first-session checklist. The private tuition parent roadmap keeps format as one decision in the full cycle.

Compare the learning job first

Learning requirementOnline questionsIn-person questions
Handwriting or paper workingCan the tutor see and annotate it clearly?Can the learner preserve independent working?
Specialist software/resourcesAre tools accessible and secure on the platform?Are they available at the location?
Discussion/essay feedbackCan both parties share and reference work easily?Is travel worthwhile for a conversational task?
Practical or physical materialsCan the task be taught safely and legitimately online?Is the tutor/location equipped and appropriate?
Frequent short supportDoes online access improve continuity?Does travel make the schedule unsustainable?
Attention/access needWhich environment reduces barriers for this learner?What reasonable setup is available?

Do not decide from an assumed “learning style”. Test the actual task and learner experience.

Run a fair trial

Use the same bounded goal in each plausible format:

  1. share the same work sample and course context;
  2. ask for a learner attempt before teaching;
  3. observe explanation, questioning and prompt reduction;
  4. use a comparable fresh task;
  5. record practical friction;
  6. ask the learner separately;
  7. compare evidence, not production polish.

If only one format is realistically available, review it against the goal rather than an imaginary perfect alternative.

Worked comparison

A learner needs help with GCSE Maths working that often becomes difficult to read.

Online trial: document camera setup is unreliable; tutor often asks the learner to type final answers, hiding intermediate working.

In-person trial: working is visible, but a long journey causes missed sessions and leaves little time for homework.

Possible decision: improve the online camera/tablet setup and trial again with a clear working protocol, or seek a closer in-person tutor. The mode label alone does not decide.

Compare safeguarding and privacy arrangements

For either format, ask about:

  • agreed adults and communication channels;
  • location and who may be present;
  • recording, storage and access to data;
  • platform account and waiting-room controls online;
  • transport, arrival/collection and private spaces in person;
  • how the child pauses or reports a concern;
  • backup if technology, location or tutor availability changes.

The current national and provider guidance relevant to your nation and setting applies; do not treat online as automatically safer or riskier.

Copyable format scorecard

Learning goal/task:
Learner preference and concern:
Work visibility/tools:
Attention/access:
Travel/technology reliability:
Safeguarding/privacy setup:
Continuity and scheduling:
Independent fresh-task evidence:
Practical cost/terms:
Decision and next review:

Sources

  1. Department for Education — Using tuition and out-of-school settings (2026-07-23)
  2. Education Endowment Foundation — One to one tuition (2026-07-23)